• Home
  • AI News
  • Bookmarks
  • Contact US
Reading: Google’s ‘Woke’ Image Generator Shows the Limitations of AI
Share
Notification
Aa
  • Inspiration
  • Thinking
  • Learning
  • Attitude
  • Creative Insight
  • Innovation
Search
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Creative Insight
    • Thinking
    • Innovation
    • Inspiration
    • Learning
  • Bookmarks
    • My Bookmarks
  • More Foxiz
    • Blog Index
    • Sitemap
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© Foxiz News Network. Ruby Design Company. All Rights Reserved.
> Blog > AI News > Google’s ‘Woke’ Image Generator Shows the Limitations of AI
AI News

Google’s ‘Woke’ Image Generator Shows the Limitations of AI

admin
Last updated: 2024/02/22 at 8:06 PM
admin
Share
3 Min Read

Far-right internet troll Ian Miles Cheong blamed the entire situation on Krawczyk, whom he labeled a “woke, race-obsessed idiot” while referencing posts on X from years ago where Krawczyk acknowledged the existence of systemic racism and white privilege.

“We’ve now granted our demented lies superhuman intelligence,” Jordan Peterson wrote on his X account with a link to a story about the situation.

But the reality is that Gemini, or any similar generative AI system, does not possess “superhuman intelligence,” whatever that means. If anything, this situation demonstrates that the opposite is true.

As Marcus points out, Gemini could not differentiate between a historical request, such as asking to show the crew of Apollo 11, and a contemporary request, such as asking for images of current astronauts.

- Advertisement -
Ad imageAd image

Historically, AI models including OpenAI’s Dall-E have been plagued with bias, showing non-white people when asked for images of prisoners, say, or exclusively white people when prompted to show CEOs. Gemini’s issues may not reflect model inflexibility, “but rather an overcompensation when it comes to the representation of diversity in Gemini,” says Sasha Luccioni, researcher at the AI startup Hugging Face. “Bias is really a spectrum, and it’s really hard to strike the right note while taking into account things like historical context.”

When combined with the limitations of AI models, that calibration can go especially awry. “Image generation models don’t actually have any notion of time,” says Luccioni, “so essentially any kind of diversification techniques that the creators of Gemini applied would be broadly applicable to any image generated by the model. I think that’s what we’re seeing here.”

As the nascent AI industry attempts to grapple with how to deal with bias, Luccioni says that finding the right balance in terms of representation and diversity will be difficult.

“I don’t think there’s a single right answer, and an ‘unbiased’ model doesn’t exist,” Luccioni said. “Different companies have taken different stances on this. It definitely looks funny, but it seems that Google has adopted a Bridgerton approach to image generation, and I think it’s kind of refreshing.”

admin Februar 22, 2024 Februar 22, 2024
Share this Article
Facebook Twitter Email Copy Link Print
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Schreibe einen Kommentar Antworten abbrechen

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert

Follow US

Find US on Social Medias
Facebook Like
Twitter Follow
Youtube Subscribe
Telegram Follow
newsletter featurednewsletter featured

Subscribe Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter to get our newest articles instantly!

[mc4wp_form]

Popular News

Geoffrey Hinton, Godfather of AI, Has a Hopeful Plan for Keeping Future AI Friendly
August 11, 2023
How AI Protects (and Attacks) Your Inbox
Juni 3, 2023
Apple Ghosts the Generative AI Revolution
Juni 6, 2023
These Clues Hint at the True Nature of OpenAI’s Shadowy Q* Project
November 30, 2023

Quick Links

  • Home
  • AI News
  • My Bookmarks
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact
Facebook Like
Twitter Follow

© All Rights Reserved.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?